DOJ Slams Sam Bankman-Fried’s ‘Intrusive’ Proposed Jury Questions


15 Sep 2023 7:52 PM

In a separate filing, prosecutors went about prepping the courthouse’s tech....

  • The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) finds FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried's proposed jury questions to be "unnecessarily intrusive" and potentially supportive of his defense.
  • Bankman-Fried and the DOJ both submitted voir dire questions, ranging from standard queries to more specific ones about ADHD and opinions towards FTX.
  • The DOJ argues that Bankman-Fried's questions about opinions on the case, defendant, and defendant's companies are intrusive and beyond the purpose of voir dire.
  • Questions about effective altruism and ADHD are deemed unnecessary, prejudicial, and irrelevant by the DOJ.
  • Prosecutors have also requested a high-speed ethernet connection, a printer, and headphones for the trial's tech infrastructure.

The sentiment of the article is negative towards Sam Bankman-Fried's proposed jury questions and the DOJ's response, highlighting concerns about intrusiveness, defense narratives, and irrelevant inquiries.

Go to publisher site

You May Ask

What are the concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Justice regarding Sam Bankman-Fried's proposed jury questions?What topics did Bankman-Fried's proposed questions cover?Why does the DOJ consider some of the questions intrusive and irrelevant?What additional requests did the prosecutors make regarding the trial's tech infrastructure?

Suggested Reads