US Government Slams Sam Bankman-Fried’s Lawyers for Proposed Questions to Court Jurors - The Daily Hodl
The Daily Hodl
17 Sep 2023 4:55 PM
The US Government is countering the attorneys of former FTX chief executive Sam Bankman-Fried, saying that they’re asking jurors “unnecessarily intrusive” questions....
- The US Government is objecting to the attorneys of former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried asking "unnecessarily intrusive" questions to potential jurors.
- Bankman-Fried's lawyers proposed asking jurors about their knowledge and opinions of the former CEO and his companies, as well as their preconceived notions of his guilt or innocence.
- The US Government argues that these questions go beyond the purpose of the voir dire process, which is to ensure an impartial jury.
- Bankman-Fried is awaiting trial for allegations of mishandling customer funds and defrauding investors in relation to the collapse of the crypto exchange FTX.
- The judge in the case has considered delaying the trial to give Bankman-Fried more time to review the evidence against him.
The sentiment of the article is neutral, providing information about the objections raised by the US Government regarding the proposed questions for potential jurors in the trial of Sam Bankman-Fried.
You May Ask
What objections does the US Government have regarding the proposed questions for potential jurors in Sam Bankman-Fried's trial?What is the purpose of the voir dire process?What are the allegations against Sam Bankman-Fried?Why did the judge consider delaying the trial for Bankman-Fried?What is the significance of the collapse of the crypto exchange FTX in relation to Bankman-Fried's trial?